تاريخ النشر: 27/10/2018

Saudi Arabia: Kingdom must be held to account for suppression of dissent, following murder of journalist and widespread arrest of women’s rights defenders 

Recognising the fundamental right to express our views, free from repression, we the undersigned civil society organisations call on the international community, including the United Nations, multilateral and regional institutions as well as democratic governments committed to the freedom of expression, to take immediate steps to hold Saudi Arabia accountable for grave human rights violations. The murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul on 2 October is only one of many gross and systematic violations committed by the Saudi authorities inside and outside the country. As the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalists approaches on 2 November, we strongly echo calls for an independent investigation into Khashoggi’s murder, in order to hold those responsible to account.

This case, coupled with the rampant arrests of human rights defenders, including journalists, scholars and women’s rights activists; internal repression; the potential imposition of the death penalty on demonstrators; and the findings of the UN Group of Eminent Experts report which concluded that the Coalition, led by Saudi Arabia, have committed acts that may amount to international crimes in Yemen, all demonstrate Saudi Arabia’s record of gross and systematic human rights violations. Therefore, our organisations further urge the UN General Assembly to suspend Saudi Arabia from the UN Human Rights Council (HRC), in accordance with operative paragraph 8 of the General Assembly resolution 60/251.

Saudi Arabia has never had a reputation for tolerance and respect for human rights, but there were hopes that as Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman rolled out his economic plan (Vision 2030), and finally allowed women to drive, there would be a loosening of restrictions on women’s rights, and freedom of expression and assembly. However, prior to the driving ban being lifted in June, women human rights defenders received phone calls warning them to remain silent. The Saudi authorities then arrested dozens of women’s rights defenders (both female and male) who had been campaigning against the driving ban.The Saudi authorities’ crackdown against all forms of dissent has continued to this day.

Khashoggi criticised the arrests of human rights defenders and the reform plans of the Crown Prince, and was living in self-imposed exile in the US. On 2 October 2018, Khashoggi went to the Consulate in Istanbul with his fiancée to complete some paperwork, but never came out. Turkish officials soon claimed there was evidence that he was murdered in the Consulate, but Saudi officials did not admit he had been murdered until more than two weeks later.

It was not until two days later, on 20 October, that the Saudi public prosecution’s investigation released findings confirming that Khashoggi was deceased. Their reports suggested that he died after a “fist fight” in the Consulate, and that 18 Saudi nationals have been detained. King Salman also issued royal decrees terminating the jobs of high-level officials, including Saud Al-Qahtani, an advisor to the royal court, and Ahmed Assiri, deputy head of the General Intelligence Presidency. The public prosecution continues its investigation, but the body has not been found.

Given the contradictory reports from Saudi authorities, it is essential that an independent international investigation is undertaken.

On 18 October, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and Reporters Without Borders (RSF) called on Turkey to request that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterresestablish a UN investigation into the extrajudicial execution of Khashoggi.

On 15 October 2018, David Kaye, the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, and Dr. Agnès Callamard, the UN Special Rapporteur on summary executions, called for “an independent investigation that could produce credible findings and provide the basis for clear punitive actions, including the possible expulsion of diplomatic personnel, removal from UN bodies (such as the Human Rights Council), travel bans, economic consequences, reparations and the possibility of trials in third states.”

We note that on 27 September, Saudi Arabia joined consensus at the UN HRC as it adopted a new resolution on the safety of journalists (A/HRC/Res/39/6). We note the calls in this resolution for “impartial, thorough, independent and effective investigations into all alleged violence, threats and attacks against journalists and media workers falling within their jurisdiction, to bring perpetrators, including those who command, conspire to commit, aid and abet or cover up such crimes to justice.” It also “[u]rges the immediate and unconditional release of journalists and media workers who have been arbitrarily arrested or arbitrarily detained.”

Khashoggi had contributed to the Washington Post and Al-Watan newspaper, and was editor-in-chief of the short-lived Al-Arab News Channel in 2015. He left Saudi Arabia in 2017 as arrests of journalists, writers, human rights defenders and activists began to escalate. In his last column published in the Washington Post, he criticised the sentencing of journalist Saleh Al-Shehi to five years in prison in February 2018.  Al-Shehi is one of more than 15 journalists and bloggers who have been arrested in Saudi Arabia since September 2017, bringing the total of those in prison to 29, according to RSF, while up to 100 human rights defenders and possibly thousands of activists are also in detention according to the Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) and Saudi partners including ALQST. Many of those detained in the past year had publicly criticised reform plans related to Vision 2030, noting that women would not achieve economic equality merely by driving.

Another recent target of the crackdown on dissent is prominent economist Essam Al-Zamel, an entrepreneur known for his writing about the need for economic reform. On 1 October 2018, the Specialised Criminal Court (SCC) held a secret session during which the Public Prosecution charged Al-Zamel with violating the Anti Cyber Crime Law by “mobilising his followers on social media.” Al-Zamel criticised Vision 2030 on social media, where he had one million followers. Al-Zamel was arrested on 12 September 2017 at the same time as many other rights defenders and reformists.

The current unprecedented targeting of women human rights defenders started in January 2018 with the arrest of Noha Al-Balawi due to her online activism in support of social media campaigns for women’s rights such as (#Right2Drive) or against the male guardianship system (#IAmMyOwnGuardian). Even before that, on 10 November 2017, the SCC in Riyadh sentenced Naima Al-Matrod to six years in jail for her online activism.

The wave of arrests continued after the March session of the HRC and the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) published its recommendations on Saudi Arabia. Loujain Al-Hathloul, was abducted in the Emirates and brought to Saudi Arabia against her will on 15 May 2018; followed by the arrest of Dr. Eman Al-Nafjan, founder and author of the Saudiwoman’s Weblog, who had previously protested the driving ban; and Aziza Al-Yousef, a prominent campaigner for women’s rights.

Four other women’s human rights defenders who were arrested in May 2018 include Dr. Aisha Al-Mana, Dr. Hessa Al-Sheikh and Dr. Madiha Al-Ajroush, who took part in the first women’s protest movement demanding the right to drive in 1990; and Walaa Al-Shubbar, a young activist well-known for her campaigning against the male guardianship system. They are all academics and professionals who supported women’s rights and provided assistance to survivors of gender-based violence. While they have since been released, all four women are believed to be still facing charges.

On 6 June 2018, journalist, editor, TV producer and woman human rights defender Nouf Abdulaziz was arrested after a raid on her home. Following her arrest, Mayya Al-Zahrani published a letter from Abdulaziz, and was then arrested herself on 9 June 2018, for publishing the letter.

On 27 June 2018, Hatoon Al-Fassi, a renowned scholar, and associate professor of women’s history at King Saud University, was arrested. She has long been advocating for the right of women to participate in municipal elections and to drive, and was one of the first women to drive the day the ban was lifted on 24 June 2018. 

Twice in June, UN special procedures called for the release of women’s rights defenders. On 27 June 2018, nine independent UN experts stated, “In stark contrast with this celebrated moment of liberation for Saudi women, women’s human rights defenders have been arrested and detained on a wide scale across the country, which is truly worrying and perhaps a better indication of the Government’s approach to women’s human rights.” They emphasised that women human rights defenders “face compounded stigma, not only because of their work as human rights defenders, but also because of discrimination on gender grounds.”

Nevertheless, the arrests of women human rights defenders continued with Samar Badawi and Nassima Al-Sadah on 30 July 2018. They are being held in solitary confinement in a prison that is controlled by the Presidency of State Security, an apparatus established by order of King Salman on 20 July 2017. Badawi’s brother Raif Badawi is currently serving a 10-year prison sentence for his online advocacy, and her former husband Waleed Abu Al-Khair, is serving a 15-year sentence Abu Al-Khair, Abdullah Al-Hamid, and Mohammad Fahad Al-Qahtani (the latter two are founding members of the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association – ACPRA) were jointly awarded the Right Livelihood Award in September 2018. Yet all of them remain behind bars.

Relatives of other human rights defenders have also been arrested. Amal Al-Harbi, the wife of prominent activist Fawzan Al-Harbi, was arrested by State Security on 30 July 2018 while on the seaside with her children in Jeddah. Her husband is another jailed member of ACPRA. Alarmingly, in October 2018, travel bans were imposed against the families of several women’s rights defenders, such as Aziza Al-Yousef, Loujain Al-Hathloul and Eman Al-Nafjan.

In another alarming development, at a trial before the SCC on 6 August 2018, the Public Prosecutor called for the death penalty for Israa Al-Ghomgam who was arrested with her husband Mousa Al-Hashim on 6 December 2015 after they participated in peaceful protests in Al-Qatif. Al-Ghomgam was charged under Article 6 of the Cybercrime Act of 2007 in connection with social media activity, as well as other charges related to the protests. If sentenced to death, she would be the first woman facing the death penalty on charges related to her activism. The next hearing is scheduled for 28 October 2018.

The SCC, which was set up to try terrorism cases in 2008, has mostly been used to prosecute human rights defenders and critics of the government in order to keep a tight rein on civil society.

On 12 October 2018, UN experts again called for the release of all detained women human rights defenders in Saudi Arabia. They expressed particular concern about Al-Ghomgam’s trial before the SCC, saying, “Measures aimed at countering terrorism should never be used to suppress or curtail human rights work.” It is clear that the Saudi authorities have not acted on the concerns raised by the special procedures – this non-cooperation further brings their membership on the HRC into disrepute.

Many of the human rights defenders arrested this year have been held in incommunicado detention with no access to families or lawyers. Some of them have been labelled traitors and subjected to smear campaigns in the state media, escalating the possibility they will be sentenced to lengthy prison terms. Rather than guaranteeing a safe and enabling environment for human rights defenders at a time of planned economic reform, the Saudi authorities have chosen to escalate their repression against any dissenting voices.

Our organisations reiterate our calls to the international community to hold Saudi Arabia accountable and not allow impunity for human rights violations to prevail. We call on the international community, and in particular the UN, to:

  1. Take action to ensure there is an international, impartial, prompt, thorough, independent and effective investigation into the murder of journalist Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi;
  2. Ensure Saudi Arabia be held accountable for the murder of Khashoggi and for its systematic violations of human rights;
  3. Call a Special Session of the Human Rights Council on the recent wave of arrests and attacks against journalists, human rights defenders and other dissenting voices in Saudi Arabia;
  4. Take action at the UN General Assembly to suspend Saudi Arabia’s membership of the Human Rights Council; and
  5. Urge the government of Saudi Arabia to implement the below recommendations.
We call on the authorities in Saudi Arabia to:
  1. Produce the body of Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi and invite independent international experts to oversee investigations into his murder; cooperate with all UN mechanisms; and ensure that those responsible for his death, including those who hold command responsibility, are brought to justice;
  2. Immediately quash the convictions of all human rights defenders, including women and men advocating for gender equality, and drop all charges against them;
  3. Immediately and unconditionally release all human rights defenders, writers, journalists and prisoners of conscience in Saudi Arabia whose detention is a result of their peaceful and legitimate work in the promotion and protection of human rights including women’s rights;
  4. Institute a moratorium on the death penalty; including as punishment for crimes related to the exercise of rights to freedom of opinion and expression, and peaceful assembly;
  5. Guarantee in all circumstances that all human rights defenders and journalists in Saudi Arabia are able to carry out their legitimate human rights activities and public interest reporting without fear of reprisal;
  6. Immediately implement the recommendationsmade by the UN Group of Eminent Experts on Yemen; and
  7. Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and bring all national laws limiting the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association into compliance with international human rights standards.
Signed,
  1. Access Now
  2. Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture (ACAT) – France
  3. Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture (ACAT) – Germany
  4. Al-Marsad – Syria
  5. ALQST for Human Rights
  6. ALTSEAN-Burma
  7. Americans for Democracy & Human Rights in Bahrain (ADHRB)
  8. Amman Center for Human Rights Studies (ACHRS) – Jordan
  9. Amman Forum for Human Rights
  10. Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI)
  11. Armanshahr/OPEN ASIA
  12. ARTICLE 19
  13. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
  14. Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
  15. Asociación Libre de Abogadas y Abogados (ALA)
  16. Association for Freedom of Thought and Expression (AFTE)
  17. Association for Human Rights in Ethiopia (AHRE)
  18. Association malienne des droits de l’Homme (AMDH)
  19. Association mauritanienne des droits de l’Homme (AMDH)
  20. Association nigérienne pour la défense des droits de l’Homme (ANDDH)
  21. Association of Tunisian Women for Research on Development
  22. Association for Women’s Rights in Development (AWID)
  23. Awan Awareness and Capacity Development Organization
  24. Bahrain Institute for Rights and Democracy (BIRD)
  25. Bureau for Human Rights and the Rule of Law – Tajikistan
  26. Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)
  27. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  28. Canadian Center for International Justice
  29. Caucasus Civil Initiatives Center (CCIC)
  30. Center for Civil Liberties – Ukraine
  31. Center for Prisoners’ Rights
  32. Center for the Protection of Human Rights “Kylym Shamy” – Kazakhstan
  33. Centre oecuménique des droits de l’Homme (CEDH) – Haïti
  34. Centro de Políticas Públicas y Derechos Humanos (EQUIDAD) – Perú
  35. Centro para la Acción Legal en Derechos Humanos (CALDH) – Guatemala
  36. Citizen Center for Press Freedom
  37. Citizens’ Watch – Russia
  38. CIVICUS
  39. Civil Society Institute (CSI) – Armenia
  40. Code Pink
  41. Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic
  42. Comité de acción jurídica (CAJ) – Argentina
  43. Comisión Ecuménica de Derechos Humanos (CEDHU) – Ecuador
  44. Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos – Dominican Republic
  45. Committee on the Administration of Justice (CAJ) -Northern Ireland
  46. Committee to Protect Journalists
  47. Committee for Respect of Liberties and Human Rights in Tunisia
  48. Damascus Center for Human Rights in Syria
  49. Danish PEN
  50. DITSHWANELO – The Botswana Center for Human Rights
  51. Dutch League for Human Rights (LvRM)
  52. Election Monitoring and Democracy Studies Center – Azerbaijan
  53. English PEN
  54. European Centre for Democracy and Human Rights (ECDHR)
  55. European Saudi Organisation for Human Rights (ESOHR)
  56. FIDH within the framework of the Observatory for the protection of human rights defenders
  57. Finnish League for Human Rights
  58. Freedom Now
  59. Front Line Defenders
  60. Fundación regional de asesoría en derechos humanos (INREDH) – Ecuador
  61. Foundation for Human Rights Initiative (FHRI) – Uganda
  62. Groupe LOTUS (RDC)
  63. Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR)
  64. Hellenic League for Human Rights (HLHR)
  65. Human Rights Association (IHD) – Turkey
  66. Human Rights Center (HRCIDC) – Georgia
  67. Human Rights Center “Viasna” – Belarus
  68. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan
  69. Human Rights Concern (HRCE) – Eritrea
  70. Human Rights in China
  71. Human Rights Movement “Bir Duino Kyrgyzstan”
  72. Human Rights Center Memorial
  73. Human Rights Sentinel
  74. IFEX
  75. Index on Censorship
  76. Initiative for Freedom of Expression (IFoX) – Turkey
  77. Institut Alternatives et Initiatives citoyennes pour la Gouvernance démocratique (I-AICGD) – DR Congo
  78. International Center for Supporting Rights and Freedoms (ICSRF) – Switzerland
  79. Internationale Liga für Menscherechte
  80. International Human Rights Organisation “Fiery Hearts Club” – Uzbekistan
  81. International Legal Initiative (ILI) – Kazakhstan
  82. International Media Support (IMS)
  83. International Partnership for Human Rights (IPHR)
  84. International Press Institute
  85. International Service for Human Rights (ISHR)
  86. Internet Law Reform and Dialogue (iLaw)
  87. Iraqi Association for the Defense of Journalists’ Rights
  88. Iraqi Hope Association
  89. Italian Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
  90. Justice for Iran
  91. Karapatan – Philippines
  92. Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights and the Rule of Law
  93. Khiam Rehabilitation Center for Victims of Torture
  94. KontraS
  95. Latvian Human Rights Committee
  96. Lao Movement for Human Rights
  97. Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada
  98. League for the Defense of Human Rights in Iran (LDDHI)
  99. Legal Clinic “Adilet” – Kyrgyzstan
  100. Ligue algérienne de défense des droits de l’Homme (LADDH)
  101. Ligue centrafricaine des droits de l’Homme
  102. Ligue des droits de l’Homme (LDH) Belgium
  103. Ligue des Electeurs (LE) – DRC
  104. Ligue ivoirienne des droits de l’Homme (LIDHO)
  105. Ligue sénégalaise des droits humains (LSDH)
  106. Ligue tchadienne des droits de l’Homme (LTDH)
  107. Maison des droits de l’Homme (MDHC) – Cameroon
  108. Maharat Foundation
  109. MARUAH – Singapore
  110. Middle East and North Africa Media Monitoring Observatory
  111. Monitoring Committee on Attacks on Lawyers, International Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL)
  112. Movimento Nacional de Direitos Humanos (MNDH) – Brasil
  113. Muslims for Progressive Values
  114. Mwatana Organization for Human Rights
  115. National Syndicate of Tunisian Journalists
  116. No Peace Without Justice
  117. Norwegian PEN
  118. Odhikar
  119. Open Azerbaijan Initiative
  120. Organisation marocaine des droits humains (OMDH)
  121. People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD)
  122. People’s Watch
  123. PEN America
  124. PEN Canada
  125. PEN International
  126. PEN Lebanon
  127. PEN Québec
  128. Promo-LEX – Moldova
  129. Public Foundation – Human Rights Center “Kylym Shamy” – Kyrgyzstan
  130. Rafto Foundation for Human Rights
  131. RAW in WAR (Reach All Women in War)
  132. Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  133. Right Livelihood Award Foundation
  134. Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights
  135. Sahrawi Media Observatory to document human rights violations
  136. SALAM for Democracy and Human Rights (SALAM DHR)
  137. Scholars at Risk (SAR)
  138. Sham Center for Democratic Studies and Human Rights in Syria
  139. Sisters’ Arab Forum for Human Rights (SAF) – Yemen
  140. Solicitors International Human Rights Group
  141. Syrian Center for Legal Studies and Research
  142. Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression (SCM)
  143. Tanmiea – Iraq
  144. Tunisian Association to Defend Academic Values
  145. Tunisian Association to Defend Individual Rights
  146. Tunisian Association of Democratic Women
  147. Tunis Center for Press Freedom
  148. Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights
  149. Tunisian League to Defend Human Rights
  150. Tunisian Organization against Torture
  151. Urgent Action Fund for Women’s Human Rights (UAF)
  152. Urnammu
  153. Vietnam Committee on Human Rights
  154. Vigdis Freedom Foundation
  155. Vigilance for Democracy and the Civic State
  156. Women Human Rights Defenders International Coalition
  157. Women’s Center for Culture & Art – United Kingdom
  158. World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA)
  159. World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) within the framework of the Observatory for the protection of human rights defenders
  160. Yemen Center for Human Rights
  161. Zimbabwe Human Rights Association (ZimRights)
  162. 17Shubat For Human Rights
  163. Bahrain Forum for Human Rights (BFHR)
  164. Gulf Institute for Democracy and Human Rights
  165. Global Voices Advox
  166. West Africa Human Rights Defenders Network (WAHRDN)
  167. The Article 20 Network
  168. Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture (ACAT) – USA
  169. Innovation for Change- MENA Hub
  170. Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture (ACAT) – Switzerland, Bern
Saudi Arabia En PDF
مشاركة المقال
الاختراقات والرقابة عبر الإنترنت تلطّخ منتدى الأمم المتحدة لحوكمة الإنترنت في الرياض
تأكّدت هذا الأسبوع مخاوف بشأن ملاءمة استضافة السعوديّة لمنتدى حوكمة الإنترنت لعام 2024 (IGF)، حيث تم اختراق جلستي نقاش تناولتا قضايا حقوق الإنسان وتم حذف محتواهما لفترة وجيزة من موقع المنتدى.
المجتمع المدني يُطالب باتخاذ الإجراءات اللازمة قبيل انعقاد منتدى حوكمة الإنترنت
منظمات حقوق الإنسان المُوقّعة أدناه، نحثّ حكومة المملكة العربية السعودي على إطلاق سراح جميع المعتقلين الذين اعتقلتهم السلطات السعودية بسبب تعبيرهم عن آرائهم على الإنترنت قبل انعقاد منتدى حوكمة الإنترنت 2024 (IG
منح السعوديّة حقوق إستضافة كأس العالم 2034 يعرّض حياة الناس للخطر ويكشف عن التزامات الفيفا الفارغة في مجال حقوق الإنسان
إن تأكيد السعوديّة اليوم على استضافة كأس العالم للرجال 2034، على الرغم من المخاطر المعروفة والشديدة التي تهدّد السكّان المقيمين والعمّال المهاجرين والمشّجعين الزائرين على حد سواء، يمثل لحظة خطر كبير.